Thought it better than II, on par with I.
having trouble parsing this - it seems equivalent to saying that the Eiffel Tower is taller than a tree but comparably sized to a toddler. am i missing something fundamental?
-steve
[ Home | Post Entry | Log in | Search | Browse Options | Site Map ]
no subject
Thought it better than II, on par with I.
having trouble parsing this - it seems equivalent to saying that the Eiffel Tower is taller than a tree but comparably sized to a toddler. am i missing something fundamental?
-steve
(no subject)