learnedax ([personal profile] learnedax) wrote2006-03-15 11:41 am

The novel of the film of the comic of the same name

O god, it burns!

If you dare, pull up Inside This Book. Or don't, you'll be better off; its morass of swirling, turgid prose itself bedecked, with dependant clauses, which were recursive, bombastic, riddled with complexities themselves fraught with abecedarian faux pas so redolent with fault that the benighted, wayward, reader, overcome with revulsion, might find itself hastily perplexed, were abominable.

[identity profile] rufinia.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Why? Why? WHYYYYYY?

(Okay, I know why- it's for people who are Too Cool or Too Grown-Up or Too Something to read a comic book. But still.)

[identity profile] goldsquare.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't say it better than this

[identity profile] hakamadare.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)

by my count, five out of eight of the “sentences” on the first page are in fact sentence fragments.

can such things be?

-steve

Why, oh why did I look inside?

[identity profile] tamarinne.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh.... GOD. *claws at eyes*

[identity profile] danceboy.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It feels very Bulwer-Lytton (sp?) to me. Which is to say it will probably do well...

Though, to be fair, it's a tough gig novel-izing a comic that was created by people who are explicitly interested in the ways that comics are different from other art forms. I think they could have actually found a writer that spoke English, but I'm not sure they were ever going to get anything good.
ext_104661: (Default)

[identity profile] alexx-kay.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder if that is the same Steve Moore who is a friend and sometime co-worker (but not relation) of Alan's? He's done a fair bit of comic-book writing, but not much previous prose, AFAIK. As a comics writer, he was competent, but not especially noteworthy.

ObAnecdote (possibly urban legend): The author of the novelization of Francis Ford Coppola's Bran Stoker's Dracula was sorely disappointed that he didn't get the gig for the follow-up. He really wanted to see the cover blurb: "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein! By the author of Bram Stoker's Dracula."

[identity profile] new-man.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
And here I thought for sure you were talking about the novelization of Man-Thing.

BTW, I am unlikely to make it to practice tonight.

Remember...

[identity profile] cristovau.livejournal.com 2006-03-16 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Remember when I swore that I'd hate you forever for "Dance to the top of Scott Bakula?" I was wrong. Exposing me to this is much worse.

I can't wait for V For Vendetta, the interpretive dance (Lakshmi isn't reading his, is she?)

[identity profile] fabrisse.livejournal.com 2006-03-17 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Deary, deary me.

I clicked on "Suprise Me." It worked. I'm always surprised when three paragraphs on the same page begin with "And". Of course, the top of the page began in the middle of, well, I'd call it a paragraph, but there were no sentences in it.

*sigh*
jducoeur: (Default)

[personal profile] jducoeur 2006-03-17 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, dear God. I expected pain, but I will admit that I didn't expect uncontrollable giggles. I mean, Steve Moore is *not* a dreadful comic book writer -- not one of the greats, to be sure, but he's generally readable and fun. But this reads like something that you might find in a Harvard Lampoon parody.

I am going to choose to believe the best: that out of friendship for Alan Moore, Steve Moore has written a novelization *so* awful that it forces people to read the original instead. I am also going to choose to believe that the movie isn't this hideously bombastic, at least until I am proven incorrect...