Syntactic heresies OR Clearly there's something wrong with me
I opened up Eats, Shoots & Leaves, and I do not make it through the acknowledgments before snidely thinking to myself "Oh, the author's one of those grammarians." Which is to say, she has not seen the light and so does not use the serial comma. Apparently that inelegant ambiguity is more tolerated in her native Britain, however, which I should perhaps take as an extenuating circumstance.
no subject
Example 1:
This is a sentence.
Example 2:
"I'm quoting something."
Example 3a:
This sentence contains a "quoted" word.
Example 3b:
I'm not sure if this is "correct".
Example 3c:
I'm not sure if this is "correct", but it is more logical to me.
...
Strangely enough, quoted dialog has never bothered me (having the comma before the quotes instead of after):
Maybe I have been conditioned to special case it (under my personal "grammar logic" rules) in my head.
*frown* Maybe I am a bad person that should be arrested and reconditioned by the Punctuation Police. I never thought of that.
This is weird. I haven't thought about my basic writing assumptions in years.