I read a review in the Globe that panned it. Then I read a review in the Herald that said it was great. Based on internal cues, I believed that the Globe reviewer was a skilled reviewer who understood his subject and that the Herald reviewer thought that as long as there was a loud soundtrack and a bright screen, what else did you expect from a good pirate movie?
When I saw the movie, I decided that they were both right. That is, the Globe reviewer was on the mark in every complaint, and the movie was fun anyway, as the Herald reviewer said.
I do think that a smaller special effects budget and a better script would have improved it tremendously.
Tightness is good for self-contained stories. But clearly a lot of the things that aren't "tight" are threads meant to continue on into the third movie.
no subject
When I saw the movie, I decided that they were both right. That is, the Globe reviewer was on the mark in every complaint, and the movie was fun anyway, as the Herald reviewer said.
I do think that a smaller special effects budget and a better script would have improved it tremendously.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)