learnedax ([personal profile] learnedax) wrote2007-06-20 12:38 am

"sneer quotes"; nothing changes

As he spoke I noticed, what had often struck me before in his conversations... that whenever he spoke of serious matters, whenever he used an expression which seemed to imply a definite opinion upon some important subject, he would take care to isolate, to sterilise it by using a special intonation, mechanical and ironic, as though he had put the phrase or word between inverted commas, and was anxious to disclaim any personal responsibility for it... But then, if it was so absurd, why did he use the word?

- M. Proust regarding M. Swann, a hundred years ago

[identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com 2007-06-20 11:37 am (UTC)(link)
I thought you were also going to post 'your' 'analysis'?

[identity profile] elusiveat.livejournal.com 2007-06-20 12:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Good find!

[identity profile] new-man.livejournal.com 2007-06-20 01:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Well yes, but "that" was "just" Proust's "opinion". And you "know" "the French" can't be "trusted".