learnedax: (sephiroth)
learnedax ([personal profile] learnedax) wrote2003-10-27 10:16 pm

(no subject)

Having just recently yet again argued this point, I went back and listened to the source material for re-analysis. So, if you think the Indigo Girls version of Romeo and Juliet is better than the Dire Straits one, I understand that it's a purely subjective choice, and I now see why you think that. But you're still wrong.

The benefit that IG imparts is a much higher level of vocal passion, and it is a fair criticism that Mark Knopfler is not the most expressive of singers. However, the advantages offered by DS are as follows: first, Mr. Knopfler actually manages to hit the notes cleanly, which gets him points over IG in my book. Second, the musical accompaniment in the DS version is unquestionably better; Mark's a guitar god and he is in fine form here. Third, and perhaps most important, the non-wailing laconic style that DG employes captures the worn-out melancholy of the song vastly better than the emotional breakdown that IG offers.

Yes, it does seem pedantic to beat this to death here, but given how many people seem to disagree with me I thought I'd centralize.
(deleted comment)

Takes off wig and puts down gold

[identity profile] its-just-me.livejournal.com 2003-10-28 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm so lost as to what you're trying to say with you're opening paragraph - need more detail

SUNG is what I can recall in this old brain of mine as what the LYRIC said - I don't think she used SANG.

Campi isn't a word either, nor is Octopi, or Platypi. After the conversation at Pennsic I indeed checked these out with a few dictionaries. It's greek and not latin for the latter two.

As for my own spelling - FEH! Deal with it!

So, in other news - Thanksgiving - if you two are stuck - there's room for you two at my table this year