It's true, he (or the minds behind him) are much more politically apt in some ways than their opponents believe. However, on a number of separate occasions strong evidence has surfaced indicating significant suppression and manipulation of the evidence gathered on Iraq. That we are seeing any of that without a driving media frenzy over it makes me wonder how much more we would see with a zealot like Kenneth Starr going after them.
Isn't our media infamous for wanting to topple public figures? Can we get some of that about now?
no subject
Isn't our media infamous for wanting to topple public figures? Can we get some of that about now?