learnedax ([personal profile] learnedax) wrote2008-07-08 07:38 am

My first thought this morning

"We need to get a bigger clock, so it can hold more time."

[identity profile] shalmestere.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 12:38 pm (UTC)(link)
IKWYM :-/

[identity profile] academicblue.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I want that clock.
laurion: (Default)

[personal profile] laurion 2008-07-08 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, if you were tracking time with a sandtimer that would work, sort of. OR we could redefine an hour as 40 minutes, giving us a 36 hour day. Or 45 minutes, for a 32 hour day if you don't need quite so much.

[identity profile] metahacker.livejournal.com 2008-07-08 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
We have plenty of time.

The problem is that it's metered at a steady pace. If you have fifteen things you like doing and each of them takes two hours and you can only do one of them every twenty-four hours, then you don't get to do each of them very often.

Maybe you need 'bunchier' time. "Can I have twenty hours of evening today, and then skip it tomorrow?"