It's not a logistical challenge, although that is not in fact a valid layout. There are three of each, and labeling them by vertex instead of edge, although it works out to the same thing, is not the way I described it. (It's also harder to read because you have to squish the characters into a smaller space.)
The actual problem is in manufacturing, because I'd like it to be nicer looking, and not ridiculously expensive.
1) I thought I was labeling edges. When I said 123 is eøI, I meant edge 12 is e, edge 23 is ø, and edge 31 is I.
2) How can you have 3 of each symbol? Anytime 1 triangle has a symbol on an edge, the corresponding other triangle will have the symbol too - that means each symbol must appear an even number of times, yes?
Yes, I missed that you wanted a cheap but nice version.
1) I'm sorry, I misread your labeling. That works just fine.
2) I can see where you would get that impression from what I wrote, but what I meant was that all three edges adjacent to a given face would have the same symbol, i.e. so that they unambiguously define a value for that face. This does correspond to a typical d4 layout.
3) It's not so much a joke as a thing that amused me.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
You just might have
The actual problem is in manufacturing, because I'd like it to be nicer looking, and not ridiculously expensive.
Re: You just might have
1) I thought I was labeling edges. When I said 123 is eøI, I meant edge 12 is e, edge 23 is ø, and edge 31 is I.
2) How can you have 3 of each symbol? Anytime 1 triangle has a symbol on an edge, the corresponding other triangle will have the symbol too - that means each symbol must appear an even number of times, yes?
Yes, I missed that you wanted a cheap but nice version.
Re: You just might have
2) I can see where you would get that impression from what I wrote, but what I meant was that all three edges adjacent to a given face would have the same symbol, i.e. so that they unambiguously define a value for that face. This does correspond to a typical d4 layout.
3) It's not so much a joke as a thing that amused me.
Re: You just might have
Re: You just might have
Re: You just might have