learnedax: (sephiroth)
[personal profile] learnedax
Having just recently yet again argued this point, I went back and listened to the source material for re-analysis. So, if you think the Indigo Girls version of Romeo and Juliet is better than the Dire Straits one, I understand that it's a purely subjective choice, and I now see why you think that. But you're still wrong.

The benefit that IG imparts is a much higher level of vocal passion, and it is a fair criticism that Mark Knopfler is not the most expressive of singers. However, the advantages offered by DS are as follows: first, Mr. Knopfler actually manages to hit the notes cleanly, which gets him points over IG in my book. Second, the musical accompaniment in the DS version is unquestionably better; Mark's a guitar god and he is in fine form here. Third, and perhaps most important, the non-wailing laconic style that DG employes captures the worn-out melancholy of the song vastly better than the emotional breakdown that IG offers.

Yes, it does seem pedantic to beat this to death here, but given how many people seem to disagree with me I thought I'd centralize.
From: [identity profile] ex-drdt.livejournal.com
since the Girls don't even sing their own songs properly, I can't imagine their interpretation of one of knopfler's masterpieces being anything but vapid. i only just found out today that they even tried to cover this piece, and am mildly disturbed at the prospect. did Amy at least get voice lessons?

i agree that with knopfler, it is all about the guitar. and the deep sexy voice. and the effortless way he just drops songs on us so we can feel them for ourselves, rather than having them felt for us by the singer.

for IG, its all about the earplugs.

Profile

learnedax

November 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 20th, 2026 12:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios