![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Huh, my culture has been violated in an unexpected way.
I have begun to notice a small but prolific segment of the online population who are self-identifying as geeks, and frequently describing things as "a cool geek thing", with no connotation related to what I think of as geekery. Having seen a few different examples, the only unifying thread I can find is that the thing in question is always considered cool by the author. Now, I understand that, as with other terms of derision applied to other subcultures in the past, the term 'geek' has been absconded with and made a badge of pride. However, even in its most positive sense I have always thought of geekdom as representing a very specific (if not easily quantified) culture - something roughly like "quasi-obsessive intellectual counter-culturalism", and when unmodified (as in "theatre geek") a specific connotation of technological obsession. It is not always a good thing, in my mind.
These persons I speak of don't seem to mean that at all. As far as I can tell, to them geek == cool, and there is no further specificity to it. That disconcerts me, like they're sneaking off with a little bit of my identity. It seems like an odd occurrence; it may be cool to be a geek, but it's also cool to be a queer, and I don't know anyone who identifies themselves that way without at least claiming some kind of non-standard orientation.
Am I misconstruing this, or is the term 'geek' becoming to dilute to be meaningful?
(Note: this is kind of a fiddly little thing to be spending time thinking about, but, in fact, that's one of the ungood things about geekery - a tendency to focus on minutiae.)
I want my elitism back!
I have begun to notice a small but prolific segment of the online population who are self-identifying as geeks, and frequently describing things as "a cool geek thing", with no connotation related to what I think of as geekery. Having seen a few different examples, the only unifying thread I can find is that the thing in question is always considered cool by the author. Now, I understand that, as with other terms of derision applied to other subcultures in the past, the term 'geek' has been absconded with and made a badge of pride. However, even in its most positive sense I have always thought of geekdom as representing a very specific (if not easily quantified) culture - something roughly like "quasi-obsessive intellectual counter-culturalism", and when unmodified (as in "theatre geek") a specific connotation of technological obsession. It is not always a good thing, in my mind.
These persons I speak of don't seem to mean that at all. As far as I can tell, to them geek == cool, and there is no further specificity to it. That disconcerts me, like they're sneaking off with a little bit of my identity. It seems like an odd occurrence; it may be cool to be a geek, but it's also cool to be a queer, and I don't know anyone who identifies themselves that way without at least claiming some kind of non-standard orientation.
Am I misconstruing this, or is the term 'geek' becoming to dilute to be meaningful?
(Note: this is kind of a fiddly little thing to be spending time thinking about, but, in fact, that's one of the ungood things about geekery - a tendency to focus on minutiae.)
I want my elitism back!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 05:04 am (UTC)is there anything... anything at all, that draws out that bit of kid in you that's constructed of pure enthusiasminium and compels you to say "THAT IS SO COOOOOOL!"? there, there is the essence of geek.
i know many math geeks, and many many science geeks, and a few word geeks, and a couple theatre geeks. oh yeah, and Gweeps. lotsa Gweeps.
---
besides, remember that Geek Pride fest thingy they had in Boston-ish a few years back? i think the term was sorta changing connotations by then. the Slashdot guys were keynotes, iirc. and i think the Ars Technica folk were in attendance, too.
even then, i see it only as an in-house jargon change. externally, in my experience, it's still a term of derision most of the time. (people take it amiss when i self-describe using the term "huge geek") of course, as people keep cranking out l33t g33k T-shirts and the like, that may change.
and frankly, i think a generation or two that thinks it's *ok* to be intellectual could hardly hurt the country atm. (given that it's acceptable for the science press to say asinine things like "this books is brilliant! i didn't understand a thing!" as a gleeful endorsement. whiskeytangofoxtrot)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-28 01:36 pm (UTC)[grin] Haven't heard this one before.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 12:46 pm (UTC)Metrosexual seems to have come to mean "caring about one's appearance", which isn't quite the same thing.
Darn Right!
Date: 2004-07-27 05:19 am (UTC)In the mean time, I will have a bowl full of live bugs and another of live mice for you on your next visit. :)
no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 12:43 pm (UTC)"I'm being geeky" has come to mean "I'm being enthusiastic about my particular specific interest". THerefore, you get theater geeks, comic book geeks, and Elizabethan geeks. It has lost the negative connotations of "so focused on a specific topic that you forget to bathe and other major social graces" and has taken on the subtly different badge of "so focused on a specific topic that you ramble a bit, gush excessively, and forget minor social graces".
no subject
What do you expect
Date: 2004-07-27 12:45 pm (UTC)While I was in Europe it became trendy to look like a computer nerd from Seattle - black rimmed Buddy Holly glasses, a uncombed (though short) haircut, a courier bag and gadgets. It was weird because it was a look, not the accidental result of poor vision and the ethic of utility over aesthetics.
Re: What do you expect
Date: 2004-07-28 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 02:13 pm (UTC)(Is this related in any way to my membership in the 'Sexy Dork' community over on Tribe? Naaaah.)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 03:09 pm (UTC)This I agree with.
and when unmodified (as in "theatre geek") a specific connotation of technological obsession.
This, I think, is not quite true. At least, in my usage-circles the unmodified term started out with a connotation of math/science obsession, not really "technology", per se. I suspect that in both our cases, what we perceive as the "unmodified" version of the term is strongly tied to who we were hanging out with when we learned it. Within a given subculture, the word doesn't need modification, it just gets modifiers when subcultures start to overlap.
I want my elitism back!
Personally, I think elitism is more trouble than it's worth. It's enough work just to be elite these days, without having to tack an -ism on the end :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-28 01:45 pm (UTC)I don't think it's gone anywhere... ;)